Are you fully protected against defamation claims?

Risk Matters - Winter 2024

The high-profile defamation case involving Ben Roberts-Smith shows that defamation isn’t just a concern for high-profile figures, but also for those serving their communities in less public roles.

It’s vital for local government officers and elected members to be aware of what constitutes defamation to continue navigating their roles effectively. By understanding the essentials, they can engage confidently and avoid any missteps.

Below, we’ll explore the essentials of defamation for members of local government. Learn about the legal framework, how to identify and handle defamation, and the specific protections available through LGIS. We’ll provide vital information to prepare members on how to navigate this complex issue confidently and effectively.

Other sections in this season's Risk Matters

Where we’ve been – Winter 2024

LGIS continued with our new workers’ compensation act roadshow, this time educating the northern metro members on the significant legislative changes. Together with WorkCover WA and legal partners Moray & Agnew, we delivered another tailored information session on the new Workers Compensation and Injury Management Act (2023) WA.

Read More »

What are the risks associated with an MOU?

Both MOUs and formal contracts are common instruments within the local government sector in Western Australia. However, it is important that members are familiar with significant and often subtle differences between MOUs and contracts as the risks associated with getting it wrong can be costly.

Read More »

What is defamation?

Defamation involves communication that harms someone’s reputation, exposing them to ridicule or contempt. Traditionally, classified as slander (spoken word) and libel (written word), however, the digital age has blurred these lines and legally, there’s no distinction between the two terms.

Under the Defamation Act 2005 (WA), Western Australia aligns with national efforts and favours non-litigious remedies to resolve such disputes, thereby preserving freedom of expression throughout Australia. Apologies, corrections, or retractions are often effective and can quickly resolve disputes. However, always seek legal advice before issuing an apology.

Difference between the aggrieved and the publisher

In this context, the ‘aggrieved’ is the person whose reputation is harmed, while the ‘publisher’ is the person who made the defamatory statement.

What’s a publication?

Forms of communication which may be defamatory include:

  • Writings (letters, reports, etc.)
  • Printed media
  • Blog posts
  • Social media posts, statuses and updates Drawings

Social media and the rising risks of defamation

Today, the internet, particularly social media, offers a multitude of opportunities for potentially defamatory statements to be made leading to potential defamation claims.

In WA, individuals can be deemed publishers simply by sharing or linking defamatory content, increasing the need for caution and awareness. Furthermore, individuals and organisations can also be liable for third-party comments on their pages.

Defamation in WA

In WA, a defamation claim must be made within one year of publication. The WA Act applies to publications made within the state, but publications occurring in other jurisdictions may be subject to the laws of those jurisdictions.

Making a defamation claim

For a defamation claim to be valid, it must involve:

  • Publication: a verbal or written statement
  • Defamatory content: false information or implications causing others to believe false information
  • Third-party exposure: Made to someone other than the aggrieved.
  • Identifiable aggrieved: The person must be identifiable from the statement
  • Absence of lawful excuse: No legal reason justifying the publication

Defences against defamation

Several defences can protect publishers from defamation liability. These include:

  • Truth – if the publication is true, there is no defamation. Contextual truth – if the publication is substantially true, any imputations are unlikely to harm the aggrieved.
  • Qualified privilege – if the publisher had a legal, moral, or social reason to publish and so is excused from liability.
  • Absolute privilege – applies to publications made during parliamentary debates, courts, or tribunal judgments.
  • Public document – republishing content from public documents (e.g. court judgments) is protected.
  • Fair report – reports of public concern are protected if fair. Honest opinion – opinions based on true facts are not defamatory if presented as an honest opinion.
  • Innocent dissemination – no liability will arise where the publication distributor did not know about the defamatory content, or did not write, create, or control the content or what was said.
  • Parody – obvious satire is not defamatory.
  • Triviality – insignificant publications causing no harm are not liable.

Concerns notices and defamation proceedings

The first step in defamation proceedings is issuing a ‘concerns notice’, which is a formal document that outlines the alleged defamatory statements made and requests amends. The publisher has 28 days to respond. Early notification to LGIS is crucial for adequate response time and effective management.

How we manage defamation claims

LGIS’ role in defamation claims is crucial. We brief our specialist law firms to handle these cases. Each case is unique, and we consider various issues, including available defences, before determining the best approach.

Protection under the Local Government Act 1995 (WA)

Local government councillors and officers have some defamation protections under Section 9.56 of the Act. This section provides immunity for actions taken in good faith within their roles. However, proving good faith is crucial, and a failed qualified privilege defence may undermine this protection.

LGIS provides protection and support

Defamation cases are notoriously costly and complex, often requiring specialised legal expertise. LGIS is here to provide members with that protection and support for defamation. We adopt a ‘firm but fair’ approach to managing all claims, supported by legal advice. Remember, early notification of the claim, collaboration with LGIS, and following legal advice are key to managing defamation claims successfully and ensuring the best outcome.

For more information, read our Defamation Guide in the member only section of the LGIS website or have a chat with your account manager.

Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Other sections of this season's Risk Matters

CEO’s Message – Winter 2024

Welcome to the Winter edition of 2024! As we wrap up the financial year, we’d like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued support. We’re pleased to share that we’ve had a complete renewal with an outstanding 100% retention of our membership.

Read more »