3,000 Building companies’ insolvent in 2023/24, what does it mean for your next capital project?

Risk Matters - Spring 2024

Building site with scaffolding

Every year local governments across Western Australia invest millions of dollars in the assets that deliver vital services to their communities. Whether it’s a new roof for the recreation centre, construction of a new administration building or creating a new home for the library, LGIS members are building, renovating, extending or repairing assets.

The question is, what happens if the contractors fail?

With the construction sector, residential and commercial combined, having the highest rate of insolvency of any industry across Australia, the probability that local governments will have challenges is higher than usual.

Year on year Australian’s see stories about another construction company going bust, at one point it seemed like a weekly occurrence. In September 2024, the West Australian reported that about 15 construction firms collapse in WA every month and that a further 27 were on the bring with massive unpaid tax bills. The state saw some of the biggest and most reputable names collapse including Pindan, ProBuild and Clough Group leaving some LGIS members in a terrible situation with major projects uncompleted.

According to corporate watchdog ASIC, there were 2832 construction industry insolvency appointments for the 2024 financial year until June 16, an increase of 28 per cent on the 2213 insolvencies over the previous financial year. In 2024/25 the trend seems to be continuing.

The construction sector, particularly those companies that had fixed-price contracts, has struggled with a surge in costs since the pandemic. Unprofitable building contracts, cost blowouts, planning delays, labour shortages, red tape and other challenges have all contributed to the staggering number of insolvencies.

Other sections in this season's Risk Matters

Where we’ve been – Spring 2024

The 2024 WA Local Government Convention over 8 to 10 October was an excellent opportunity to chat with members and talk about the issues that matter to you. Over 650 delegates attended from across the state and we appreciated the effort many made to seek out our team to provide feedback and ask questions.

Read More »

What happens when a contractor collapses halfway through a project?

Our suburbs are littered with abandoned building sites that sit vacant for months or even years. Often this is because the contractor is struggling with cashflow or has become insolvent during a project. In most cases where the contractor/ construction company were the party responsible for obtaining the necessary insurance it is highly likely that the insurance coverage has also ceased. The project is left unfinished and without any protection against potential losses.

Imagine if this occurred on one of your local government’s projects? It puts your organisation in a challenging position as it can be difficult to seek a new contractor to take over the remaining works, as well as provide the required insurance. This can lead to further complications and delays, resulting in additional costs.

Who holds the insurance on your project?

Local government construction projects are complex bringing with them the additional consideration of high community interest. There’s often a wide range of work required for the project to be completed, multiple parties and various stakeholder interests.

Whatever the project the finished product must meet a high standard of workmanship, be delivered on time and on budget, and meet the needs of the community.

Construction insurance is a useful tool to make sure that your project can continue if there are issues. It’s essential to ensure a project runs smoothly, regardless of the size or scale of a project. While the specific insurance requirements may vary depending on the project’s scope, it plays a crucial role in managing the risks associated with the project, such as complying with legal requirements, covering capital investment and protection against unforeseen events.

Typically, local governments look to the contractor to arrange insurance coverage for construction projects, however, relying solely on the contractor can pose its own risks.

Basically, this means that the ‘principal’ (local government) has passed the responsibility for implementing insurance of the works and third party (public) liability insurance to the head contractor. The contractor must include all parties, including subcontractors, on the cover.

How can you protect your local government?

Given the current situation in the construction sector, along with horror stories from local government experiences, many local goverments now want to have more control over insurance arrangements for their key projects.

This is called ‘principal arranged construction cover’ (PACC) and allows local government to have much greater control on cover decisions. PACC will:

  • Ensure the cover supports your local government’s objectives – which often differ from those of the contractor.
  • Removes the risk of the contractor’s insurance cover lapsing without your awareness.
  • Ensure adequate cover, as many contractors’ insurances have proven to be inadequate (or in some cases non-existent) in the past.
  • Removes concern that the contractor’s insurers might not be regulated or approved by APRA.
  • Lessen the difficulty in controlling a large number of contractors’ and subcontractors’ insurances through a long project period, or over a large number of contracts.

A PACC is a procurement approach that offers project owners enhanced protection, control, and security. Essentially, a PACC involves the project owner taking charge and acquiring bespoke insurance coverage for the contract works and third-party liability, ensuring all parties involved are covered.

One of the benefits of having principal arranged insurance is that it simplifies the handling of a contractor insolvency event. If a contractor becomes insolvent during a project and a PACC is in place, the impact of this event is typically easier to manage. This means that the insurance coverage would not be cancelled and the local government would still be protected against potential losses. The local government would then need to assess the works completed and find an alternative contractor to take over the remaining works. As a result, additional costs and delays that may arise from such a situation are avoided.

What types of projects can a PACC protect?

Principal held cover can protect a diverse range of local government major works projects including, but not limited to:

  • Construction of new buildings
  • Refurbishment of existing buildings
  • Swimming pools
  • Road construction
  • Earthworks
  • Landscaping
  • Bridges
  • Jetties
  • Tunnels
  • Airport runways
  • Rail works

More information

Talk to your LGIS Account Manager for more information and advice on how a PACC could sort your local government’s next major project.

Case study: Local government left in the lurch at 90% completion following Pindan Group collapse

An LGIS member faced a dire predicament when construction industry stalwart, Pindan Group, went into external administration. The collapse left 1,400 creditors owed up to $80 million and projects across the state came to a halt.

At the time the local government had engaged Pindan Group to complete a multimillion-dollar project. The community was deeply invested in the development and the stakes were high.

Pindan group was required under contract to hold the necessary cover for the project. This meant that when the contractor collapsed the project came to an immediate standstill and the local government had little control over next steps. A bank guarantee or bond will not provide adequate protection for this scenario.

The build was at 90% completion and no other insurer would take on the risk as construction was almost complete.

The member had no choice but to complete the project at their own risk. This was a substantial exposure for the local government. Fortunately, nothing further went wrong and the building was completed, however it meant that the member had been exposed at their own risk for the remainder of the project.

The risk transfer exposures would have been better managed if the local government had held a PACC.

Lessons

  • Review your local government’s risk appetite for major projects
  • Consider ‘worst case scenarios’ in the project and how they can be mitigated.
  • Consider a taking out principal arranged construction cover for full control and certainty that your local government’s needs are met.
  • Review procurement contracts and make sure that if insurance is requested it is accurately scoped.
  • Closely review tenders and proposals that include insurance. Make sure you thoroughly understand who, what and the extent of the protections provided.
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Other sections of this season's Risk Matters

CEO’s Message – Spring 2024

The recent WA Local Government Convention was an excellent opportunity to chat with members and talk about the issues that matter to you. LGIS also appreciated the invitation from WALGA to provide members with an update at their AGM on our 2023/24 results and achievements. For more information, our end of financial year reports, A Year in Review and Annual Financial Report, are now available on the LGIS website or you can read the article on page 18.

Read more »

Playground liability assessments for regional members

By their very nature playgrounds have an element of risk, designed to challenge children and deliver development opportunities. They’re valued and sought-after amenities in every local government area across Western Australia. They also come with high levels of expectation from the community that they will be well designed, in appropriate locations and maintained in a condition that ensures safe and enjoyable experiences for children

Read more »